Devv Hub

👏 Hi everyone, welcome to Devv hub!

🧐 Before, we used github issue to collect your feedback, which we found a bit inconvenient for a lot of users and hard to visualize.

❤️ Therefore, we have decided to put our feedback, changelog, and roadmap together here. Every post is automatically added to our todo list and reviewed in 24 hours.

Feel free to let us know what we are doing well and what we need to pay attention to. We care about what you think!

UI Enhancement Suggestions to Improve User Experience

Hello, I would like to suggest several UI improvements that would enhance the user experience: For thinking models, please add a toggle for enabling/disabling the thinking mode (for models where this feature is available). The colour scheme became too simple and lacks necessary contrast. It is now difficult to perceive code in light colours only, as there used to be a contrast with black. This reduction in contrast impacts readability during coding sessions. The edit mode now displays a super small window with scroll functionality, which makes it very inconvenient to copy text from there and edit effectively. A larger editing area would greatly improve usability.

AirstaN 5 days ago

💡 Feature Request

Feedback Regarding Missing Models in Selection Options

I've noticed that Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek-related models have disappeared from the available model selection options. This seems inconsistent with what's shown in the Claude 4.0 changelog screenshots, where these models are clearly visible. I'm concerned that this might be a technical issue rather than an intentional change, as other users have reported similar experiences in community forums. Additionally, I'd like to inquire about the timeline for implementing the "thinking mode" feature in Claude 4.0. This feature would be very valuable for my use cases, and I'm looking forward to its availability. Could you please provide information on: Why Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek models are no longer available in the selection options When we can expect these models to return, if applicable The projected timeline for the thinking mode feature in Claude 4.0 Thank you for your attention to these matters.

zhiyue 23 days ago

7

💡 Feature Request

中文问题,中文回答,但是偶残渣俄文。

能够打通小周天的人有多少。 这是我的提问。 下面是回答: 关于有多少人能够真正“打通小周天”,这是一个很难给出确切数字的问题,原因如下: 定义模糊:什么是“打通小周天”本身就存在不同的理解。不同流派、不同传承对“打通”的标准和体验描述可能不一致。有些人可能只是体验到一些气感,而另一些人则可能达到更深层次的能量循环。 主观体验:小周天是一种主观的身体体验,很难用客观标准来衡量。即使是经验丰富的老师,也难以准确判断学生的真实情况。 隐秘性:传统上,气功修炼被认为是比较私人的事情, практикующие обычно не афишируют свои достижения. 因此,即使有人 действительно 打通了小周天,也未必会公开。 缺乏统计:目前没有任何机构或研究对 практикующие 气功的人数以及他们 достижение 小周天的情况进行过大规模的统计。 尽管无法给出确切数字,但可以肯定的是,真正能够“打通小周天”的人数相对较少。 以下是一些可能影响“打通”成功率的因素: 正确的指导:明师的指导至关重要。没有正确的指导, практикующие 可能会走弯路,甚至出现偏差。 持之以恒的练习:小周天 не достигается 一蹴而就,需要长期坚持练习,积累足够的能量。 身心状态: практикующие 需要保持身心放松、平静,才能更好地感知和引导能量的流动。 个体差异:每个人的身体状况、 энергетическая чувствительность 和领悟能力都不同,这也会影响 их прогресс. 总而言之,虽然“打通小周天”被认为是气功修炼的一个重要里程碑,但它 не является 容易实现的目标。需要正确的指导、 длительные усилия 和良好的身心状态。 之前就偶尔有俄文,但是只有一两个单词,这次这个答案有很多俄文

fsdgfsdgfsdfds 9 days ago

6

💡 Feature Request