Suggestion for Improving the Code-Generation Quota Policy

Dear [Product / Support Team],

I hope you are well.

While using the service, I noticed that the monthly quota of 15 code-generation sessions is quickly exhausted. In my experience, more than half of these sessions are spent fixing bugs in previously generated code. Counting every debugging attempt against the same quota feels counter-productive and disproportionately raises the real cost of obtaining working code.

To address this, I would like to propose two complementary ideas:

1. Quota Deduction Based on Successful Deployment
   Only deduct a session from the quota when the generated code builds and deploys successfully. If the build fails, the attempt would not count, acknowledging that the output did not yet meet expectations.

2. Introduce a Limited Retry & Rollback Mechanism
   • Allow a maximum of 3–5 repair attempts per original request.
   • Once the limit is reached, automatically roll back to the last version that deployed successfully.
   • The user can then make further changes from that stable baseline, preventing endless fixes from consuming the quota.

These changes could protect platform resources while giving users confidence that each quota session truly advances them toward production-ready code.

Thank you for considering this feedback. I am happy to provide additional details if helpful.

Best regards,

MarkHoo

markhoo@foxmail.com