first impression

In my current communication with now 22 Q&A, it's a bit better then rubber-ducking, especially as it's listing the sources.
Nevertheless, it's missing many details, which it lists and explains though when asked for it. Coding without a basic understanding of the problems is not possible, at least with higher grade of quality -- the missed aspects are just to many and to grave to rely on the produced code, without the knowledge to specify the missed points.

It's fun though to verify some side aspects without much efforts, it would take much more time manually.

Concerning the copy-button below the answers I'd wish that the question itself and the sources are included too, perhaps even the related items with links, so that it's much easier to save the complete results.